Hawking the poltical spinners.
Blind Political Opportunism Unleashed
Published on September 25, 2004 By hitparade In Democrat
Dean and Kerry are in tactic collusion with terrorist. Direct correlations exist between the increase in attacks in Iraq and Howard Dean and John Kerry's incessant Bush bashing. The terrorist could not defeat America militarily and had, in essence, thrown in the white towel. But then the terrorist spotted opportunity. They observed Dean passionately rally the left to relive the good ole days of protesting against the war Vietnam. The more Dean and Kerry bash Bush, the more the insurgency grows. More Americans die. Political opportunism at its ugliest low.
Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Sep 25, 2004
I don't know if you've noticed, but there are actually liberal soldiers. You don't have to be Republican to love your country and want to serve. The title of your article is very insulting to the many liberal soldiers and officers serving in our armed forces.

on Sep 25, 2004
Political opportunism at its ugliest low.


I thought that "political opportunism" happened in every war. Or peace too, for that matter...
on Sep 25, 2004
This is quite possibly the dumbest thing i have heard in a long time.
on Sep 25, 2004
Please take your lithium.
on Sep 25, 2004
You know, at first I didn't even read your article because I was so focused on the ridiculous wrongness of the title. I have read your whole paragraph of a blog, and I would like to second thatoneguy's comments. *cuckoo . . . cuckoo . . . cuckoo*
on Sep 25, 2004
hitparade.............while the liberals don't have a direct hand in killing our young men, they certainly don't help by not supporting the war on terror. if the democrats would just get behind the president the enemy could be crushed in no time.
on Sep 26, 2004
They encourage terrorists, period. Terrorist say, "You shouldn't be here." Kerry and his ilk point to the act and say "See, we shouldn't be there." Terrorists say "We will bog you down in a new Vietnam." Liberals say say the same thing.

If the message is the weapon, and it surely is, then what does it matter if a rich senator is saying it or a terrorist? It is still a weapon. Kerry and Pelosi and everyone using war propaganda, stretching the truth, destroying our morale; they are all traitors to their country.

Next week, when the terrorists sit around deciding what to do, they have a good idea because of the statements made by these ghouls that their tactics are working, and that their efforts are having an impact. As long as they see that beheading people and killing US personel squelches our ability to support the war, they'll keep beheading people.

The sad part is Kerry and the rest aren't cowards, they are opportunists. IF they were cowards it would be excusable. Instead they are climbing up piles of bodies to get to their power. Shame on them.
on Sep 26, 2004
The sad part is Kerry and the rest aren't cowards, they are opportunists. IF they were cowards it would be excusable. Instead they are climbing up piles of bodies to get to their power. Shame on them.


He has done it twice already.

Once during Vietnam and again he tryed in Niceraqua.

It's Kerry's way of gaining power. By spreading American defeatism.
on Sep 26, 2004
This is the wrong war, period. We went into a secular nation, denounced by Osama bin Laden and other extremists, looking for al Qaeda. Iraq isn't a part of the war on terror. We went into a secular nation with virtually no terrorists, and made it a breeding ground for fundamentalists and extremists. We went looking for WMD. 1 year and 5 months later, the ones we should have attacked, Iran, are the ones making nukes. We should have attacked Iran or Sudan, or any of the other nations that actually have al Qaeda ties. If you believe that Democrats are the ones in Iraq with AK-47's following some fanatical cleric, or if you believe that Democrats are against the war on terror, then you have been watching way too much Hannity and Colmes and reading too much Ann Coulter.
on Sep 26, 2004
Baker......

I am sooooooooooo dissappointed in you right now. You just earned a troll buddy! The mere suggestion that Kerry is a traitor is just wrong! If the current administration even had a plan, then MAYBE he would have stood by his decision to back bush 2.0. How many more soldiers have to die while he sits there with his thumb up his a** and comes up with a plan to deal with Iraq?

on Sep 26, 2004
thatoneguyinslc : You are too smart to spout this "They don't have a plan" stuff. This is the US military and the President of the United States. It's asinine to say "they don't have a plan". They successfully liberated Afghanistan and Iraq in an impossibly short amount of time with an amazingly small number of casualites. There are hold-outs and insurgents, but those have been commonplace in every war we have ever fought.

Kerry, Micheal Moore, and the liberal mainstream opposing the war, are traitors to their country. Feel free to troll me again. Put their "message" right next to enemy propaganda from WW2, from Vietnam, compare it to terrorist speeches now. They continually overstate our losses, ignore our successes, claim that the soldiers are dying needlessly, claim that the war is being fought for covert, unjust reasons. Their message is could be rehashed Tokyo Rose speeches.

As I have said before, the message is the weapon, and Kerry and ilk are firing it as much as any terrorist organization, and for completely self-serving reasons. He is purposefully harming his nation, and aiding the cause of our enemies, for personal gain. That is the textbook definition of traitor.
on Sep 26, 2004
It is sad that we live in a day and age where voicing your opinion contrary to the current ruling group is considered treason. I fear for the world our children will live in if this current attitude continues.
on Sep 26, 2004
" It is sad that we live in a day and age where voicing your opinion contrary to the current ruling group is considered treason."


If it were only opinion, there wouldn't be a problem. The facts are being misrepresented, the truth is twisted, lies are told, and ALL WITH THE SPECIFIC GOAL OF UNDERMINING SUPPORT FOR THE WAR AMONG THE US PUBLIC AND THE MILITARY.

They are using half-truths, Moore-esque "questions", and outright lies to demoralize and splinter the will of the American people. That isn't simple expression, that is a pointed, overt attempt to subvert the war for the personal gain of the people involved. If that isn't treasonous, what exactly is?

I also fear for our children. A nation as splintered and self-obsessed as we have become cannot stand, period. No decisions can be followed through on, there is no respect for authority, so solidarity,nothing. The US is becoming a self-indulgent, nihilist mess. We don't believe in anything, we don't think anything is worth doing. Yes, I think our children are very much in danger from the current mode of thought here.

on Sep 26, 2004
Why must we support every war? Why must we all follow rank and file behind whatever our leaders say? Is that the key to being a good American? Is that what we all should do, because not supporting war is paramount to treason? Is that to say everyone who speaks out critically about the government and whatever they're doing and tries to persuade people to their way of thinking is a traitor? That's not treason, that's our right as Americans. We are supposed to question and disagree with the acts of our government. We do this by protesting, by giving speeches and by VOTING. We fought a revolution against our parent nation under that idea.

You would trade our freedom for our safety. I would rather be a free man able to speak my mind and be open to possible attack than be safe and secure but be unable to say what I wish.
on Sep 26, 2004
No, there is a difference between not supporting and undermining. There is a difference between speaking critically and lying and purposefully constructing propaganda that makes things seem far worse, or unreasonably questions the intent of the President.

You don't care, I realize that, but the majority of the words coming from the anti-war ghouls ARE LIES or vast misrepresentations.

This isn't about saying "I don't agree with war, I don't think we should be there." This is about Moore, Kerry and the rest misrepresenting Iraq, misrepresenting Bush, misrepresenting the actions of the military and the successes they have achieved, and mimicking terrorist statements FOR PERSONAL GAIN. These people are seeking wealth and power and doing it by subverting the morale of the US military and general public.

Make this a "free speech" issue all you like, but there is a reason that propagandists in other wars have faced criminal charges. The message Radio Tokyo broadcast during WW2 and that of Farenheit 9-11 is almost identical in thought and spirit. One was a crime, the other is free speech? Hardly.
2 Pages1 2