This guy would stab his mother in the back to become president

Funny you should mention this. According to Kerry, before he decided to run, he went to his dying mother's bed, and she gave him 3 words of advice if he decided to run: "Integrity, Integrity, Integrity". It is patently obvious, he has betrayed his own mother and stabbed her in the back! He has no Integrity.

Hmmm, and Bush has never exploited a situation to get what he wants... : )

You say jumping on the bandwagon, I say calling the President on something he fucked up. Potato, Po-tat-o.

If you're still reading, I got this from today's Guardian (www.guardian.co.uk)

"An October surprise is the beast in the woods of electoral lore and
mythology, the unexpected news event or revelation that comes out of
the blue with the potential to swing the whole thing one way or
another.

What follows is exactly an October surprise, but the slow-burning
charges and counter-charges surrounding the missing Iraqi explosives
are developing in some quite surprising ways.

It began with a New York Times report that 340 tonnes of powerful
explosives under International Atomic Energy Authority monitoring had
gone missing after the US-led invasion. John Kerry picked up on it
immediately and called it "one of the great blunders of Iraq".

Republican officials tried to discredit the reports. A form of
salvation appeared to come in a Monday night NBC broadcast that said
its embedded reporter with the 101st airborne division had arrived at
the site on April 10 2003, when troops found conventional weapons but
not high explosives. A spokesman for the Bush campaign said the
report made "John Kerry's latest ripped-from-the-headlines attack
baseless and false".

But NBC had another surprise. Tom Brokaw, the evening anchor, said
last night that the station had never said the explosives were not
there. It said US troops had not found them, but it was not clear
whether the whole compound had been searched.

"We simply reported that the 101st did not find them," Brokaw told the
viewers. "For its part, the Bush campaign immediately pointed to our
report as conclusive proof that the weapons had been removed before
the Americans arrived. That is possible, but that is not what we
reported."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1337887,00.html

And maybe, when this is verified, you should take the word "specious" out of the title...

Reply #2 By: itgirl - 10/27/2004 11:23:14 AM Hmmm, and Bush has never exploited a situation to get what he wants... : ) You say jumping on the bandwagon, I say calling the President on something he fucked up. Potato, Po-tat-o.

Sorry it's called talking without knowing what your talking about! And as far as the Guardian piece goes this is unadulterated unconfirmed spit! Notice one thing about the NBC piece? They also didn't say it *WAS* there either.

Kristol: N.Y. Times and CBS 'Conspiring' With Kerry to Defeat Bush What a treat on "Fox & Friends" this morning: William Kristol hammered the pro-Democrat New York Times and pro-Democrat CBS for "colluding" and "conspiring" with Sen. John Kerry to topple President Bush. Even Kerry's own handlers now admit they have no proof to back up the issue the Democrats concocted with their media allies. [More below...] Kristol notes in his new column for Weekly Standard: "Pressed on Tuesday afternoon about the accuracy of the allegations on Fox's Big Story with John Gibson, Richard Holbrooke, a senior adviser to the Kerry campaign, said: 'You don't know the truth and I don't know the truth.' He later underscored this point: 'I don't know the truth.' "That minor issue hasn't kept the Kerry campaign from creating a television ad based on what may well be untruthful claims. ... Shouldn't he at least make sure that such a charge is true?" But in the Democrat playbook there's no entry for truth. The party's longtime strategy is to repeat a lie until people believe it. Thanks to their media collaborators, and President Bush's wimpy refusal to denounce the Times and "60 Minutes" and Kerry and John Edwards, the stunt could succeed. At least a few voices are speaking out. "Kerry gins up his attack machine based on a flawed New York Times story," the Republican National Committee noted Tuesday. Richard Lessner, executive director of American Conservative Union, blasted the story "a cheap, baseless and partisan hit-job on President Bush" and pointed out that "neither the Times nor CBS has much interest in reporting the facts."